Active Health GuideIndependent supplement reviews
Consumer research for adults over 50

What is in the bottle, what it costs today, and how the refund really works

Supplements sold through online sales pages are hard to research: the Supplement Facts panel is buried, the price changes by the week, and the guarantee is written to be skimmed. We pull those three things out of the marketing, check them against the source documents, and publish what we found, including the parts the seller would rather you not read.

Advertising disclosure: our reviews contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. That never changes a verdict or a score.

Every number has a sourceEach price, serving size, ingredient amount and refund term points to the document we took it from, with the date we checked it.
Missing information is reported, not filled inIf a formula hides its doses in a proprietary blend or shows no third-party lab test, the review says exactly that.
We are researchers, not physiciansWe verify documents and compare claims. We do not give medical advice, and we say so on every page.

Latest reviews

One product at a time, researched from the label outward, and updated when the offer or the refund terms change.

Memopezil memory support capsules, from the Active Health Guide Memopezil review
Memory & focus

Memopezil Review 2026: What the Label Says, and What the Sales Page Sells

3.9 Editorial score, out of 5

A memory capsule that publishes its complete label with no proprietary blend, which is rare and worth crediting. The review puts every dose next to the studies, explains what the name borrows from a prescription drug, and shows why the ingredient the sales page advertises most is the one ingredient the label does not list.

Read the Memopezil review
ProstAfense prostate support capsules bottle, from the Active Health Guide ProstAfense review
Prostate & men's health

ProstAfense Review 2026: The Doses That Match the Trials, and the Charge the Page Says Does Not Exist

3.8 Editorial score, out of 5

A two-capsule-a-day prostate formula whose plant sterol and pygeum amounts actually land inside the ranges used in published trials, which is rare in this category. The review puts every dose next to the research, answers the tamsulosin and PSA questions no other page addresses, and documents the monthly charge waiting inside a checkout that promises no subscriptions.

Read the ProstAfense review
Visium Pro vision support capsules bottle, from the Active Health Guide Visium Pro review
Vision

Visium Pro Review 2026: The Real Label, the AREDS2 Comparison, and the Refund Fine Print

4.2 Editorial score, out of 5

A one-capsule-a-day eye supplement with seven vitamins and minerals plus a 351 mg proprietary blend. The review compares every amount on the label with the AREDS2 formula studied for macular degeneration, explains why the beta-carotene on the label matters for anyone who smokes or used to, and walks through the 60-day refund rule that other sites get wrong.

Read the Visium Pro review
NervoLyn nerve support capsules bottle, from the Active Health Guide NervoLyn review
Nerve & neuropathy

NervoLyn Review 2026: The Label Math, the 60-Day Refund Rule, and the Gabapentin Question

4.2 Editorial score, out of 5

A one-capsule-a-day nerve support formula with 80 mg of magnesium and a 575 mg proprietary blend. The review does the arithmetic the label invites, shows why the guarantee is 60 days on the official order page and not the 180 days other sites repeat, walks through the return rules step by step, and answers the gabapentin and pregabalin question no other page addresses.

Read the NervoLyn review
Glyco Harmony blood sugar support drops bottle, from the Active Health Guide Glyco Harmony review
Blood sugar support

Glyco Harmony Review 2026: The Real Label, the 60-Day Refund Rule, and the Metformin Question

4.2 Editorial score, out of 5

A liquid blood-sugar-support supplement with chromium and a 200 mg proprietary blend of 22 ingredients. The review shows the real Supplement Facts panel, explains why the formula is identical to a hearing supplement from the same manufacturer, answers the metformin and insulin question no other page addresses, and maps the 60-day refund rule that starts on the order date.

Read the Glyco Harmony review
Audifort liquid hearing supplement dropper held in a hand, photo from the Active Health Guide Audifort review
Hearing & tinnitus

Audifort Review 2026: What Is Actually on the Label

4.2 Editorial score, out of 5

A liquid hearing-support supplement built on a 22-ingredient proprietary blend. The review reproduces the full Supplement Facts panel that most other write-ups get wrong, walks through the 90-day refund process step by step, and flags the gap between the four months of use the brand recommends and a guarantee window that closes before that.

Read the Audifort review

More reviews are in progress. Each one goes through the same six checks described below before it is published.

What we cover

Our focus is supplements marketed to adults over 50 through long-form sales pages and video presentations, the corner of the market where claims are loudest and the label is hardest to find. Eight categories, added one review at a time.

Hearing & tinnitus Liquid drops and capsules sold for ringing, age-related hearing changes and "ear nerve" support. 1 review published
Nerve & neuropathy Formulas sold for tingling, numbness and burning in the feet and hands, checked against the label and the drugs people already take for it. 1 review published
Blood sugar support Chromium and botanical blends marketed for glucose and metabolic support, checked against the real label and the drug interactions that matter. 1 review published
Sleep Night-time formulas with melatonin, magnesium or herbal blends, checked against the amounts used in studies. 1 review published
Memory & focus Cognitive support products aimed at older adults, where the ingredient list rarely matches the video promise. In research
Joints & mobility Collagen, glucosamine and turmeric formulas sold for joint comfort and everyday movement. In research
Vision Eye health supplements checked against the AREDS2 formula, the real label, and the eye drops and medications people already use. 1 review published
Prostate & men's health Saw palmetto and beta-sitosterol products sold through long-form sales pages, with the refund terms read in full. 1 review published

How we work

Every review goes through the same six checks, in this order, before a verdict is written. If a step cannot be completed, the review says which one and why.

  1. Locate the actual Supplement Facts panel. When the sales page does not show it, we find it on the bottle image, the order page or the retailer listing, and we tell you where it came from.
  2. Record the price on the official order page and date it. Single bottle, multi-bottle packs, shipping and any "today only" discount, captured on the day of publication.
  3. Read the refund policy in full. Length of the guarantee, the day the clock starts, whether opened bottles are accepted, who pays return shipping, and the return address.
  4. Separate the ingredient research from the finished product. A trial on one ingredient at one dose is not evidence for a blend that does not disclose its amounts.
  5. Identify who is behind the product. The seller of record, the customer-support line, the manufacturing claims, and whether the spokesperson has any published credential.
  6. Publish the gaps alongside the strengths. Undisclosed doses, absent third-party testing and untraceable testimonials are reported in the review, not left out of it.
What we will not do

We do not invent ingredients, reuse the brand's own star rating, publish testimonials we cannot trace, or claim that any supplement treats, cures or prevents a condition. If a product's own numbers do not hold up, that goes in the review.

Start with the review that is already published

The Audifort review shows the full method in practice: the complete label, the dated price, the refund walkthrough and the questions that remain open.

Read the Audifort review